there are multiple ways to absorb the following schizoanalytical interventions: an academic way—which, in oscillating between condemnation and co-optation, either takes or leaves the text in its integrity—and a revolutionary way—which takes and leaves it at the same time, doctoring it to its requirements in an attempt to use it in order to elucidate its own co-ordinates and guide its practice. the only question is to try to make a text work. and, from this point of view, what has always been alive in co-opted schools of thought, in their initial stages, is not the coherence of their statements, but the fact that the very act of enunciating them represents a breaking off, a way of telling the obsessing limitations of hegelian dialectics, bourgeois political economy, academic psychology, and the clinical psychiatry of the time, etc. to go to hell.
‘i’ am nothing more or less than the affective experiences/meanings ‘i’ conjure.
feel free to use these various works in any way you see fit (or unfit).